Audit Summary Deck
Specifications
- Slides
- 10 slides
- Aspect ratio
- 16:9 (Widescreen)
- File format
- PowerPoint (.pptx)
- Font
- Calibri
- Version
- 1.0
- Editing
- Fully editable
- Primary color
-
#854D0E
Style
Tags
About this template
A deck for after the fieldwork ends
Ten slides for reporting the outcome of an internal audit, an external audit response, or an ISO / security assessment to management. It is a results summary, not an audit plan or a working checklist: keep the full findings register in a table and move only the top items here. The cover subtitle shipped with the file is sample wording, so replace it with the audit type and the period covered.
How the agenda lines map to slides
The agenda reads audit overview, scope, findings and corrective actions, key figures, trend analysis, so you do not have to invent the running order, and each line carries a progress marker such as “— 01 / 05” that shows where you are during the talk. Every one of those five lines already has a slide behind it: the overview on the divider-and-body pair at slides 3-4, scope on slides 5-6, findings and corrective actions on the two-column slide 7, key figures on the four cards of slide 8, trend analysis on the bars of slide 9. Only the first two sections have a divider-plus-body pair, so if you need to split findings by department or by grade, duplicate the 5-6 pair, then renumber the SECTION labels and the progress markers on the agenda. If you have few findings, slide 7 alone is enough.
Order of edits
- Replace the cover subtitle and the “2026 / presenter / affiliation” line with audit type, period covered, fieldwork dates and auditor.
- Slide 4 ships with the fieldwork window (4-29 March), the team (4 auditors, 72 person-days) and coverage (all 6 departments). Keep that period / effort / coverage skeleton and change only the values.
- Slide 6 ships with 480 vouchers sampled, 92 original contracts inspected, and 3 documents never delivered. That third line is the scope limitation; a report that hides what you could not examine blurs accountability later.
- Grade the findings you will put on slide 7 as significant, improvement or advisory, highest first. Write each as one line per element: observation, the rule it breaches, root cause, action, due date. Findings with no rule behind them belong in discussion, not in the report.
- Slide 7 pairs three findings (7 undocumented payments, 3 missing original contracts, 2 departments without separation of duties) with three remedies (mandatory electronic evidence, central custody of original contracts, approver split from executor). Check that the columns line up one to one, put a target date in the right-hand column where nothing has started, and push anything beyond three findings onto a duplicated body slide.
The four tiles and the department bars
Slide 8 holds 13 findings, 480 items sampled, 2 significant findings, 30-day remediation window. The point of the layout is that the numerator sits next to its denominator: 13 alone tells nobody whether that is high, but 13 against 480 does. The 480 also appears on slide 6, so never change one without the other. Slide 9 is four bars – procurement 164, sales 132, administration 98, HR 86 – captioned “index”. Reuse them as findings per department or findings per items sampled, and if you enter counts, change the caption too. The bars are shapes, so their lengths do not follow edited numbers.
How the rates are counted
Completion rate = closed findings / total findings; items still within their due date are not counted as closed. If you keep the 30-day window on a tile, state somewhere in the body whether day one is the notification date or the report date. Track repeat findings separately – a finding that returns means the earlier root cause analysis was wrong, and that is the number management reads first.
Where audit decks go wrong
- Naming individuals; assign remediation to a department.
- Using “as soon as possible” as a due date, which guarantees a repeat finding.
- Cramming more than ten findings onto one screen; three per column is the layout’s limit, and shortened lines drop the rule reference and the cause first.
- Leaving the closing line as a pleasantry – put the next review date and the contact for progress reporting there.