Compliance Training Deck

About this template

Fourteen slides for a mandatory session

Fourteen slides for the compliance and ethics training that has to be run and recorded, not just delivered. The order is deliberate: real cases first, then the rules those cases broke, then the test to apply in the moment, then how to report and what protects the reporter. The agenda on slide 2 lists seven lines and four of them get a divider plus a body slide (3-4, 5-6, 7-8, 9-10), so the body of the session is eight screens and runs comfortably in 30 to 40 minutes with discussion.

Cases before rules

Slide 4 opens with “These happened here, not somewhere else.” and lists three disciplined over entertainment caps, trading price data with a rival, and a fine for late subcontractor payment. Replace these with anonymized incidents from your own company as soon as you have any; the whole persuasive weight of the deck rests on that first line being true. Slide 6 then names the rules: the Anti-Graft Act’s KRW 30k meal cap, the Fair Trade Act ban on collusion, and Article 7 of the code of ethics on conflicts of interest. These are Korean statutory references and the caps are the ones set under Korean law, so if you deliver the same session to an overseas team, swap the statute names rather than translating the thresholds.

The judgment slide is the one to slow down on

Slide 8, “What to do”, carries the working test: it is judged by intent, not by the amount; if you received something, report it within five days; if you are unsure, ask before you act. Slide 10 covers protection – an anonymous hotline open at all times, no HR penalty for reporters, findings reported within 30 days. Both of those commitments are checkable, so do not put them on a slide unless the hotline exists and the 30-day clock is real. Slide 11 is the OK / Not OK comparison: a meal under KRW 30k with a partner, citing public market information and a family-event gift under KRW 50k on one side; accepting hospitality mid-review, pre-agreeing prices with a rival and sole sourcing to a family firm on the other. Run this slide as a quiz rather than a reading – cover the right column, ask the room, then reveal.

Records and numbers

Slide 12 carries 100% all staff completed, a pass score of 70, 5 days to report and 3 disciplinary cases. The first tile is a target on the day you present and a fact only afterward, so caption it as one or the other. Slide 13 splits last year’s reports across Bribery 12, Conflicts 21, Power abuse 17 and Data leaks 11 – 61 reports in total against 3 disciplinary cases, which is a ratio worth explaining before someone asks whether the other 58 went anywhere. If your channel logs are confidential at that level of detail, replace the bars with categories only and drop the counts.

Running it well

• Reading the statutes aloud and skipping the cases. Slide 4 exists because nobody remembers a clause number.
• Presenting the KRW 30k and KRW 50k figures as the whole rule. Slide 8 says the test is intent, and that ordering matters.
• Promising anonymity the system cannot deliver.
• Closing on “When in doubt, ask first” without saying who to ask. Put the name, the extension and the hotline address on slide 14.